|
PAOLA BUONADONNA: All over Europe, the left is
in power. Britain, France and Germany all elected left-of-centre governments
in just over a year. 11 out of the 15 governments in the European Union
are run by Social Democrats. It started with Tony Blair's victory in May
1997. In France Lionel Jospin became Prime Minister a month later.
In Germany, Gerhard Schroeder was elected Chancellor last September. Tony
Blair has transformed British politics. Now he wants to export his Third
Way philosophy to the continent. New Labour says jobs flexibility and
market liberalisation is compatible with social justice. But the Third
Way strategy is controversial.
KEITH VAZ, MP: The Third Way is not a fuzzy
compromise between Left and Right. It's a modernisers' agenda for social
democracy. And hopefully the philosophy of the Third Way will help to
modernise the agenda of social democracy in Europe.
PIERRE MOSCOVICI: I don't think the Third Way is
exportable, for example in Europe because we have another history. We
were for example in France in power during the years our British friends
were in opposition. And we don't feel like the Third way is good for us.
RUDOLF DRESSLER (Interpreted) We don't want to encourage
the British to change anything. That's for them. And the English shouldn't
encourage us to give up our system. That is for us to decide.
BUONADDONA: Tomorrow, Europe's Social Democratic
leaders will gather here in Paris for a meeting of the Socialist International.
They'll try to agree a common platform for Socialism in the next century
- but it won't be easy - Gerhard Schroeder's SPD is split, Lionel Jospin
will present his own blueprint, which he calls The New Alliance and is
very different from Tony Blair's Third Way. Both the French and the British
Prime Ministers are very keen to assert their leadership of the Left in
Europe.
The meeting will take place in the gleaming business complex of La Defence,
at the edge of Paris, a symbol of the modernity of the French economy.
Tony Blair will only visit briefly. There will be another conference of
centre-left leaders in Florence in 2 weeks. But it is here in Paris that
discussions of the different visions of the future will begin.
French Senator Henri Weber is the main author of Jopsin's paper. He
believes the role of social democracy is to mediate between capital and
labour. The need to protect the workers is all the more important in the
age of global markets.
SENATOR HENRI WEBER: The underlying principle of
French Socialism and possibly the key difference between us and Tony Blair
is that we have retained a very critical stance vis a vis contemporary
capitalism. Basically we are in favour of market-driven economics, freedom
of enterprise and we are keen to foster private development at all levels
but we also believe that the state, the public authorities at local, regional,
national and European level should play a central role in both economics
and social affairs.
BUONADONNA: France hasn't embraced New
Labour's approach to reform. The German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder adopted
the Third Way - which he renamed the New Centre - by signing a joint manifesto
with Tony Blair just before the June European elections. It created a rift
with Lionel Jospin, who felt slighted by what he saw as Tony Blair's attempt
to muscle in on the special Franco-German relationship. But it also caused
tensions within Schroeder's own party and critics say it's cost him a succession
of electoral defeats .
DRESSLER: The paper may be tailor
made for the British situation - I don't want to pass judgement on that
- but to transfer this to Germany must lead to misunderstandings, must
lead to irritation and raise questions which cannot be answered in the
way as in Britain..
BUONADONNA: Anthony Giddens, the leading
British exponent of the Third Way, drew the political in-crowd at this
conference in the centre of Berlin on Thursday.
BUONADONNA: Among the Giddens admirers
gathered here, is Government economics minister Siegmar Mosdorf. He wants
to modernise the German economy but believes that Germany must find its
own way to do that which may involve high welfare spending as well as
increased taxes on the rich.
SIEGMAR MOSDORF: We don't need a softer language,
we don't need more compromises, we need a very strong, very straight position
also in the government. But we must explain it and we must have the philosophy.
What we want to do is to say to the people and also to the members of
the party that we have clear goals for the future together with Tony Blair,
but we must go different ways because of the different situations in the
countries.
BUONADONNA: Attitudes to public spending
redistribution and job flexibility differ widely in Britain and the Continent.
The Blair Schr�der document says that having the same job for life is
a thing of the past, Social Democrats must accommodate the growing demands
for flexibility. It calls for a business friendly environment with less
regulation. Whereas the French Socialist Party says Social Democrats must
pursue an employment policy which respects the right to work and doesn't
encourage job insecurity. It believes that new forms of regulation are
needed to control the new global market place.
MOSCOVICI: Flexibility in French is an
awful word, it means that the workers are totally submitted to the will
of the firms, that they are like objects or merchandise and that's what
we don't want.
BUONADONNA: One way in which the French
government prevents it is through state control - half of Renault is still
owned by the state. France also offers much greater employment protection
to its workforce. And from next January there will be a thirty-five hour
week which Jospin's government believes will generate more jobs. But while
France's economic growth is the envy of Europe, unemployment at eleven
per cent is still nearly double that of Britain.
CHARLES GRANT: Jospin's introduction of
the thirty-five hour working week is an old left style measure rather than
a Blairite measure. However, at the same time that this thirty-five hour
working week is being introduced much more flexible working practices are
coming at the same time. So even there they're using the thirty-five hour
working week to modernise some aspects of the French economy so the overall
effect may not be harmful.
BUONADONNA: There is also debate on taxation,
spending and the welfare state. The Anglo-German manifesto says: 'Public
expenditure has more or less reached the limits of acceptability. Constraints
on 'tax and spend' force radical modernisation of the public sector.'
The French Socialists
agree and also argue that social investment on health, education and training
cannot replace the traditional function of the welfare state. In other
words, the state will always have to provide the generous safety net.
France spends considerably
more on its railways than Britain does. The railway network SNCF is still
totally state owned. The French government is convinced that publicly run
industries can provide a better service than private companies.
MOSCOVICI: We believe that there
are some public expenses which are at the same time just and efficient,
especially those who are made up for preparing the future. If we invest
in innovation and if we invest on the information society, if we invest
on space, if we invest on also public infrastructure which are necessary
for the people, in trains for example, well this is useful and this is
why we're still in favour of an efficient public spending.
VAZ: This is not a competition
between Britain and our partners in the rest of Europe. I think every
finance minister in Europe and indeed in the world will want to ensure
that they are prudent with public expenditure as Gordon Brown has been.
BUONADONNA: There's another important difference.
The Third Way document says that: "in the past the promotion of social
justice was sometimes confused with the imposition of equality of outcome."
The emphasis is on people taking more individual responsibility for their
welfare. The French manifesto says that: 'the goal for Socialist governments
is to win people over to the idea of redistribution." They must listen
to the middle classes but try to persuade them to accept left-wing policies.
WEBER: This implies that income
must be taken from the well to do, from those who benefit most from progress
because our economic growth is not the result of the achievements of this
or that individual but of the combined efforts of society as a whole.
VAZ: We believe fundamentally
in the values that we've always had but we also believe that those values
need to be made relevant to the lives of people in this country, not words
on pieces of paper but actual deeds. We have been able to do what we've
done for the British people because we have got a strong economy and we
promised to be prudent.
BUONADONNA: Here in London, the question
of the future of Socialism in Europe may appear remote. But the scope and
pace of economic reforms on the continent is central to Downing Street's
strategy on the European Single Currency. Tony Blair hoped to use the Third
Way to persuade the British public that France and Germany, the engines
of the Euro, would follow New Labour's lead in modernising their economies.
Yet only five months after the launch of the Anglo-German manifesto the
rest of Europe seems far from persuaded.
GRANT: I think Tony Blair is keen
to export the idea of the Third Way to Europe, because he wants to be seen
to lead in Europe. It's a kind of intellectual leadership he's searching.
MOSCOVICI: One of the reasons why
there cannot be for the time being British leadership in the socialist
movement is that you didn't make for the time being the total choice of
Europe. Britain can be a leader in Europe and I'm looking for that, I'm
expecting it, but when the pound will be part of the Euro, because the
Euro is our main common realisation and this is why for the moment I think
that the British Labour is not totally at the centre of the European socialist
movement.
VAZ: I've had many conversations
with Pierre and indeed other Euro ministers who are like minded, they
all believe there are lots of common values that we can work on. There
is no question of anybody trying to impose views
BUONADONNA: Europe is changing - what started
as a common market is now a currency area and could even become a political
union. But the leaders of the centre-left parties which rule most of the
EU subscribe to very different philosophies. Whoever wins their ideological
battle may decide the future shape of Europe.
|