|
JONATHAN BEALE: A new life has started and with
it comes new rights, rights that should allow a mother and father to see
much more of their child growing up. Yvonne Griffin is five months pregnant.
When the baby's born she and her husband John will each be entitled to
thirteen weeks off work - unpaid.
Matilda and Lars Bilk
from Sweden already have another mouth to feed - Alice is one and a half
years old. In their country parents have long enjoyed the right to share
up to a year off work to spend time with their baby. And in Sweden it's
paid leave.
HARRIET HARMAN MP: I've been pressing the Government
to step in and pay it to make sure that everybody has an equal access to
this new right.
WILSON STRUTTE: If they do paid leave and
there's no compensation for the employer I think "Disaster".
BEALE: Parents are being given
new rights as a result of European Union legislation. But while many countries
are offering paid parental leave, Britain is not. The Government is caught
in a dilemma. It wants to be seen helping families cope with the competing
demands of parenting and work, but at the same time it doesn't want to
scare business which says will have to pay a price.
ALAN JOHNSON: Some businesses aren't happy
with what we've introduced. Some trade unions aren't happy with what we've
introduced, but we've introduced what we said we would introduce. We've
done it for the benefit of people at work with parental responsibilities
and in the interests of family friendly policies.
BEALE: John and Yvonne lead a hectic
life. Both work full time. He's a manager for a company in Lancashire,
she's a manager for a firm near Bradford. Yvonne is already planning
to use her eighteen weeks maternity leave when the baby's born. But both
would also like to make use of their new parental rights.
YVONNE: It would be nice to have
some time off work with the child when it's born wouldn't it.
JOHN: Very convenient.
It would be nice to spend as much time off as possible really.
YVONNE: Yeah when we're starting
a family.
BEALE: But John's boss sees parental
leave as another thorn in the side of British business. Wilson Strutte
employs thirty-six people selling tyre maintenance and repair products.
He says he can't afford to fill the gap if staff take time off, even
if it is unpaid.
WILSON STRUTTE: It's going to have a detrimental
effect on businesses, particularly on the smaller businesses where employees
are not lost in side offices and behind screens. You know when you've got
thirty six people here, fifteen who work at head office, everybody counts.
We are a team and if one's away, it's noticed because we're all doing a
full day's job.
BEALE: The Government has had to
consider not just John and Yvonne, but also their employers. So Ministers
have said that bosses will be able to negotiate with staff. They will
only be guaranteed a maximum of four weeks off in any one year. More controversially
the Government says the new rules only apply to children born after December
the fifteenth.
HARMAN: There is a strong argument
that that is in breach of the European directive on parental leave. And
therefore what they should do is say any child, even if it was born this
year or last year or the year before. If it's under five the parents should
be entitled to parental leave in respect of that child.
ALAN JOHNSON: All countries introducing
it under this directive have introduced it with a cut off date. And I think
that's perfectly understandable and you know we took legal advice on this
as well. We can see no case for any legal challenge.
BEALE: The Government says it's
listened to the concerns of business and so is applying the legislation
with a light touch. But that has disappointed parents, trade unions and
many of the Government's own backbenchers who believe it should be doing
more to encourage parental leave. They fear that without any financial
incentives to take time off work the new rules will simply become a perk
for the rich.
YVONNE: I couldn't afford to take
time off work unpaid.
JOHN: Neither of us could
take time of work without pay.
YVONNE: We couldn't afford to,
not the way we live at the moment.
RUTH KELLY: Unless it's paid I just don't
think fathers are going to take advantage of it and I don't think the low
paid are going to take advantage of it. Obviously they will do in crisis
situations but we want to do more than that, we want to change the way
that people view their workplace in its relation to their family.
BEALE: The Government's own estimate
suggests a small proportion of parents will use their new entitlement if
it's unpaid. Only thirty-five per cent of women and two per cent of men.
But in European Union countries where parents are paid the take up rate
is much higher.
In Holland, not everyone
receives financial compensation, but most public sector employees do.
In total forty per cent of women and nine per cent of men take time off
work to be with their child.
Sweden has the most generous
arrangements - everyone gets paid by the state. Here ninety per cent of
women and seventy-eight per cent of men take advantage of parental leave.
Matilda and Lars Bilk
receive eighty per cent of their salary when they take their parental leave.
In Sweden, most families split it so that the father takes one month off,
the mother eleven months. It's transformed the way men in particular view
their role in family life:
LARS BILK: I guess the Government
wanted to push fathers to be more involved in their kids early years and
the life in general I think that's the idea.
MATILDA: To encourage both parents
to be with their child, to really get this deep contact as I think the
Government in Sweden found out is necessary for the children I think.
BEALE: The Evidence from abroad
shows that for parental leave to be a success it has to be paid. If it's
not few parents will be able to afford to take time off work. And that
would mean the legislation failing to deliver the social benefits it was
designed for.
Mothers have long been
left at home holding the baby. And there was a time when the man was
the only breadwinner. Today more and more mothers are going back to work.
This legislation could be a boost for sexual equality as well as family
life. But it could also cost the Government hundreds of millions of pounds.
Many Labour MPs though believe fathers need an incentive.
KELLY: There's evidence from Scandinavian
countries and lots of other European countries that if you pay for parental
leave it changes behaviour, that the culture at the work changes. That
expectations change and that people see family as very important and they
start to take that leave
BEALE: But businesses say the consequences
for them would be unacceptable. If the Government offers parents payment,
more staff will be prepared to take time off work.
STRUTTE: I just wonder what would
happen if they have twins or triplets or quads, they wouldn't work at
all. If they actually make it attractive for someone to take the time off
then it will just add to the unemployment in this country. Because I don't
believe smaller companies such as ours can survive that sort of thing.
JOHNSON: Well even if the Government
did contribute towards it that would still put a burden on business. What
the government couldn't do is assist a small company, for instance, who
would have to get someone in to replace that worker. So giving money to
the person who's taking parental leave - even if that comes from Government
still means that there's a burden on business here.
BEALE: Tony Blair and his Government
may say they're against paid leave, but his pregnant wife Cherie has spoken
out in support of the principle. With such prominent advocates the Government
cannot ignore the issue. This week it will set up an independent monitoring
committee to review the take up rate. The argument is far from over.
HARMAN: I think there's a lot of
concern from the back benches that the government should really act to
be a family friendly Government, to really support parents. I think there's
a lot of commitment on that. There's a lot of commitment also that the
Government stands for equality, it doesn't want things that some families
could have and others can't afford. So I think those two things together
do amount to a sense that parental leave should be paid.
KELLY: When any policy is being
implemented you should do it as carefully and sensitively as possible.
But at the end of the day if the policy isn't delivering to families then
that policy will have to change.
YVONNE: Yes it will cost but in
the long term there is great benefits to be had from it from families.
BEALE: It may be the season of
goodwill, but in the short term the Government is unlikely to be handing
families money to make use of their new right let alone the kind of generous
arrangements which have enabled the Bilks to enjoy more time with their
daughter. But if the Government really wants British families to spend
more time with their children it will probably have to take the risk of
upsetting their employers.
|