|
|
|
|
|
OTR HOME INTERVIEWS PEOPLE BEHIND THE SCENES MORE POLITICS BRAINTEASER CROCODILE NEWS BBC NEWS ONLINE |
Interview with Alistair Darling |
................................................................................
ON THE RECORD
ALISTAIR DARLING INTERVIEW
RECORDED FROM TRANSMISSION BBC-1 DATE: 30.11.97
................................................................................
JOHN HUMPHRYS: Paul Wilenius reporting there. Alistair
Darling, how are you going to respond. How is the Government going to respond
to those MPs who want you to loosen the purse strings a bit?
ALISTAIR DARLING: Well, we owe our election victory to a
large extent to the fact that we promised to ensure that the public finances in
this country will be put on a stable basis. Now we are not going to repeat the
mistake of previous governments who came into office, started spending money
and then had to rein in in the remaining part of the parliament, nor are we
going to repeat the mistakes that Lord Lawson made in the 1980s when he
completely misread the economic signals. He allowed the country to go on a
binge which ended up in one of the deepest recessions we have seen this
century. Our position is quite clear. We intend to overhaul the public
finances to ensure that our priorities - the priorities that got us elected in
May - are met, but we are going to ensure that the public finances are there
and sustainable so that we can have the steady growth that people want to see
and that we don't get into the 'boom and bust' cycle that we have seen in the
past.
HUMPHRYS: But those MPs have looked at the figures
as well and they've seen what you've seen, which is that public borrowing next
year is going to be half what the Treasury had expected to be, so there is a
bit of money in the kitty - quite a lot of money in the kitty as far as they're
concerned, and they think that you can afford it. You are saying to them
'absolutely not!'
DARLING: At the moment, we spend some twenty five
billion pounds a year on debt repayments. That's more than we spend on
schools, for example, and at this stage in the economic cycle we should not be
adding to debt - which is what was happening at the time of the last election
because we were running a substantial deficit, nearly twenty two billion pounds
last year. Gordon Brown in his budget in July made it clear that reducing debt
over the next three years was very, very important because otherwise you just
won't have the platform on which to build in the future. You know, if you
allow debt to pile up when the economy is actually in recovery and when it is
growing strongly, then you really are storing up problems for yourself in the
future were there to be a slow-down at that time and my colleagues - the vast
majority of whom I think accept this, know that the priority of this Government
is to ensure we get stability so that we can get sustainable growth in the
public services that everyone wants to see. You know, if I could just mention
of course, you know, since the election you shouldn't overlook the fact that
despite the constraints upon us, despite the fact that we are having to take
some tough decisions, we have actually put nearly four billion pounds into
health and education this year and next. Money that would not have been there
but for the change of Government.
HUMPHRYS: I don't know where you get this 'vast
majority of the MPs' from. I mean, we've seen one hundred and twenty plus sign
the letter to the Chancellor; I talked to one at the weekend, Roger Berry, who
said he hadn't come across a single MP who supports what you are doing as far
as single mothers is concerned, and there is a huge number of them out there
who are opposed to what you are doing and they've seen the same figures that
you have seen. They are not fools, are they?
DARLING: Yes, I was watching the BBC news all day
yesterday when I was told that there were two hundred MPs rising up. By the
end of the day it appeared there were precisely four at the meeting referred to
and that Roger had engaged in some speculation as to just how many might be
behind him.
HUMPHRYS: Well, there were one hundred and twenty
plus who signed the letter, I mean that's a matter of record, isn't it.
DARLING: A number of my colleagues asked the
Chancellor to ensure that so far as the changes to the lone parents benefit was
concerned that it should be phased in with the improvements they were making in
the Welfare to Work Scheme, providing childcare places for lone parents to help
them go to work. And now we've done that, we've brought forward, as Gordon
Brown announced last week the Welfare to Work Programme which will provide one
million places for children, enabling lone parents to get into work. Now, if I
can just make a rather important point here which is sometimes overlooked in
these things: the present welfare system isn't working, everybody knows that.
It was designed over half a century ago for an entirely different workplace.
Women now comprise the majority of the workforce, nearly a fifth of families in
this country are headed by lone parents and only forty per cent work. Now, one
of the reasons that only forty per cent work is because when you speak to lone
parents they will say, 'well I can't get anyone to help with the childcare' or
'it is too expensive and it doesn't make work worthwhile'. So the whole
strategy so far as our reforms are concerned is to do everything we can to
encourage people and to help people get into work because in work you are far,
far better off than you will ever be if you are relying totally on benefits.
HUMPHRYS: Well, all those MPs know all about that,
their letter came after all of these various proposals and what the Chancellor
said in his Autumn statement and all the rest of it. That came at the weekend.
DARLING: But actually most of the signatures went
on before. You know, we all wander around lobbies and we all know what's going
on.
HUMPHRYS: But they sent the letter afterwards, I
mean, they could have said 'look I now want to remove my signature because I
heard the Chancellor', you know you are making it sound as though they are a
terribly naive bunch. Maybe they are, but do you believe they are?
DARLING: No, my colleagues are not at all naive.
HUMPHRYS: Well, then they wouldn't have sent the
letter if they didn't want to send the letter, would they?
DARLING: I've explained to you what was in the
letter and I've explained to you that the Government had already met that
objective and I think you will find that the vast majority of my colleagues are
united in the support for the Chancellor's determination to get a stable
platform on which we can build in the future. I don't think anybody really
wants to go back to the situation we've had in the past where previous Labour
Governments - and Tory Governments - have made the mistake of spending money
they couldn't afford to at the start of the Parliament to end up with cuts at
the end. And they also support ... can I finish this important point? ... I
think everybody also supports a major plank of our electoral platform which is
to modernise the welfare state to help people get into work. We are doing that
particularly as far as lone parents are concerned, we are also looking of
course at other measures indicating the tax and benefits system.
HUMPHRYS: Well fine - let me follow precisely that
up, because what they're concerned about is that you are damaging your own long
term plans. I mean you talk about the importance of getting people on welfare
into work and nobody would dispute that, but what you are now doing by cutting
these lone parent benefits is actually damaging that very aim - and that's the
point, that's what they are so concerned about!
DARLING: No, I don't think they are saying that
at all. What we are doing is spending some three hundred million pounds...
HUMPHRYS: Over the next many years possibly. This
year it's only sixty million, let's be clear about that, that's confusing
people.
DARLING: You can't produce a million places, you
know, instantly, but from April next year right across the country there will
be places which will help lone parents get the childcare they want and they
need to help them get into work. As I say, only forty per cent of lone parents
work in this country, it's something like eighty per cent in France and in
other countries it's generally higher and if you look at the pamphlets that the
Treasury published last week on modernising the benefit and tax system, you
will see that in there one of the main barriers preventing people from going to
work is lack of childcare places. There are other barriers as well...
HUMPHRYS: That's a factor, certainly.
DARLING: ...you know, the impact of coming off
benefit and coming into the tax system. Now, right across the board we are
making improvements in the welfare system and there's various proposals now
being worked up which will actually help people get into work and surely it
must be the Government's objective - given the changed nature of the workplace,
given the fact that people are going to be coming in and out of work, that we
have one household in five with nobody in work, it must be the Government's
objective to do everything it possibly can to help people get into work.
HUMPHRYS: And my point to you is that you are not
helping in that by cutting these benefits. You tell me to look at the latest
Treasury pamphlet. What about looking at the statement that your own party put
out just before the election about these particular benefits when you said -
and I quote - "it is a Welfare to Work benefit, cutting it worsens the poverty
trap". That's what you believed in April, the election was in May, then you
changed your mind.
DARLING: No. When we came into power there were
all sorts of matters that we had to attend to, many of which we inherited. The
government made its choice, the government has decided that its priority must
be to help lone parents get into work. And I think that has, you know, the
overwhelming support.
HUMPHRYS: But you're not. That's the point I'm
making. You're damaging that longterm aim, that's the whole point. It's what
you said before the election.
DARLING: We are helping lone parents and others,
you know as well, get into work. Both by reforming the system as I said,
providing the childcare places that are absolutely essential and also, you
know, this is an important point, we are putting in hand substantial steps that
will lessen the problem that people face coming off benefit, going into work
when they end up paying effectively very high rates of tax. Those are
important strands in our approach, they will be effective and they are being
developed during the course of this parliament. I believe that what we are
doing is absolutely right because it is giving people opportunity, opportunity
that they have not had up until now.
HUMPHRYS: But there will be less incentive. By
your own declaration before the election, there will be less incentive for
single mothers, lone parents, to get into work because some of them will be
appreciably worse off. And all this is to save..you say three hundred million
pounds, it's actually sixty million pounds over this next year during the time
when you are in this self-imposed financial straitjacket. An extraordinary
thing to do when you are going to have to borrow six billion pounds less than
you thought you were going to have to borrow next year.
DARLING: Well let me deal with the two parts of
your question. Firstly the money, the money that is being allocated is coming
from the Windfall Tax and from the new opportunities fund so it isn't effected
by the overall general...
HUMPHRYS: It's just accounting...change that
around.
DARLING: Well, no, it was made clear that, right
from the start that's where the money was coming from.
HUMPHRYS: That's where you said it had to come
from. It didn't have to, it didn't matter how you slice the cake, does it.
DARLING: Well where you raise money from does
actually matter. But the point is we've made that money available and that
money will be available starting from April. But the main point that you were
raising there, is the fact that for many people work doesn't actually pay. Now,
it's that problem that is the fundamental driver of all our reforms. That's
why we, for example, want to provide more childcare places, that's why we want
to move towards a starting rate of income tax of ten pence, when we can afford
to do that because it lessens the barrier and the jolt that sometimes people
can feel when they come off benefit and they go into work. We are looking at
integration of the tax and benefit system because again that will make it more
attractive for people to go into work. And we're looking at the working
families' tax credit which again means that when people go into work, they will
see the benefit of it.
Now, this sort of reform just hasn't
been looked at by any government in the past, you know our own included. And
half a century on from the Beveridge reforms, of just the first Labour
government in 1945, it is high time that we looked at these problems, we are
tackling them, it will take some time to do it but we're well on the way to
doing it. If you look at Gordon Brown's pre-Budget report last week, the whole
thrust of it was creating the economic stability we need so that we can
get..create the wealth in the first place that we need and the jobs that we
need, and reforming the Welfare State to encourage people to get into work.
HUMPHRYS: Are those cuts going to carry on after
these two years are up. Are you...you won't be restoring them will you?
DARLING: Well, I shall repeat the point that you
shouldn't overlook. We've put more money into schools, more money into
hospitals, there was a major boost to help pensioners last week.
HUMPHRYS: That's not answering the question though
is it. I was asking you a specific question.
DARLING: I wouldn't want you to overlook that
point.
HUMPHRYS: Well you've made it already as you say.
So perhaps you'd answer that question, will those cuts continue?
DARLING: At the moment, as you know, the
government is engaged in a complete review of all its spending. Every penny of
the three hundred and twenty billion pounds that we spend, and at the end of
that process, which will be completed next summer, we will set out our
objectives, our priorities that we intend to meet for the rest of this
parliament and beyond. At that time, we will determine how much the government
is going to spend in the remaining part of this parliament.
HUMPHRYS: Alright, in the very immediate future,
the coal industry is in crisis, or so it tells us and many people believe to be
the case. Are you going to help them out. There's a report this morning that
you will help a little because otherwise an awful lot of mines are going to
close, a lot of people are going to lose their jobs.
DARLING: Well again, we've inherited a difficult
legacy in that the last government almost prided itself in not having an energy
policy.
HUMPHRYS: Are you going to help them out is the
question.
DARLING: Well we've taken a number of steps which
will help to ensure that coal has a level playing field . We've taken steps to
stop the dumping of cheap coal in this country. We've removed the disadvantage
that coal had as against nuclear - so far as the levy is concerned. And over
the last few days there have been some encouraging signs. Remember, many of the
other producers, the non-Budge producers, have already signed contracts with
the generators. Budge himself has been making some progress over the last few
days.
HUMPHRYS: So no more help?
DARLING: Our objective is to ensure that there is
level playing fields. That coal isn't discriminated against because that's in
no-one's interests. But you know as far as direct subsidy is concerned, which I
don't think anyone's asking for, no that isn't our policy.
HUMPHRYS: Well a little bit of price support in
the meantime to tide him over because I recall, as you know doubt will, Robin
Cook now Foreign Secretary, saying not that very long again, letting the pits
close would be short-termism on a criminal scale. But you are telling me this
morning that you are prepared to let those pits close are you?
DARLING: No, what I'm saying to you is, the
government has already announced a number of steps that will help the coal
industry and to ensure that we do have a balanced energy policy. You know I
have explained what we have done there, so far as the fossil levy is concerned,
we've asked the regulators to look at the gas contracts, to ensure that there
isn't a bias against coal. We're taking steps to ensure that we don't get the
cheap coal that is dumped in this country at the present time. There's a whole
range of things that the government can do. The tragedy is that we, of course,
could only start this work when we got elected in May, when it really should
have been done several years ago.
HUMPHRYS: Can we look at the council spending
round that is coming up this week, I was going to say next week, it's this week
isn't it. Are you going to let the council spend more, or are you going to
give them more so they don't have to raise local taxes.
DARLING: John Prescott will be making a statement
so far as English local authorities are concerned later this week. And I dare
say I would get into great trouble if I told you what was in it.
HUMPHRYS: Well what's the philosophy, what's the
policy.
DARLING: The philosophy is that local government,
as with the whole of central government, has to stick with our overall policy
which is to maintain a tight discipline over spending. And that philosophy
applies to local authorities just as much as it applies to us.
HUMPHRYS: There's going to be big cuts then aren't
there.
DARLING: Well, can I just - the important area of
education, we've already taken steps to ensure, you know as I said to you
earlier, that the extra billion pounds that we promised for schools, will
actually be spent in the front line. So, in areas where there is the maximum
priority, particularly so far as education is concerned, then we've already
taken the steps that will ensure that that is delivered. But overall - can I
just repeat this point - the reason that we are maintaining tight control of
public spending, is because we are determined to avoid a situation where
spending runs away from us, as has happened to governments in the past, and we
then have to embark on severe retrenchment, you know three or four years down
the line. We're not going to do that.
HUMPHRYS: There will be more cuts then in local
government spending over the next year. That's inevitable from what you just
said isn't it, because they're going to get, what is it, one point six per
cent or something, half the rate of inflation.
DARLING: I'm not saying that. What I am saying..
HUMPHRYS: It's bound to be isn't it. I mean you
get more money for education, you're not going to get more money for anything
else, therefore - you don't have to be a mathematical genius to work it out,
they're not going to have the money to spend are they, there will be cuts.
DARLING: I was making the point that there will
be more money for education next year. The other point that I was making is
that John Prescott will be making a statement in the House of Commons, which is
the right place to make it this week.
HUMPHRYS: But, there is not going to be more
money. You made that clear because you started your answer by saying: we're
going to be firm.
DARLING: Yes, and I can repeat that. That is
giving no secret away. This government is determined to maintain tight control
of public spending and at the moment you know within that, of course, many of
my colleagues, you know David Blunkett is a very good example of this; has been
able to reallocate money, for example, into further education, which has
benefitted.
I just think the point is worth making
that since we've been elected, we have been able through scrutinising the money
the government already spends to start delivering on those matters which we
attach great importance to, such as further education. That money was
reallocated and partly benefits from the fact that unemployment has been
falling. That money has been reallocated, so that it will help further
education. We've done the same in health, we've done the same in schools. We
are making progress but, as we said, during the course of the Election, which
is one of the reasons why we got elected with such a huge majority is that it
would take time to turn around the situation we inherited.
HUMPHRYS: So, let's-
DARLING: We've only been in power for six months
but-
HUMPHRYS: Alright.
DARLING: -we are making substantial progress,
progress that would not have been made had it not been for the change of
government.
HUMPHRYS: And you restricted your spending to the
last government spending figures for these next two years. Now, when those two
years are up, can you say to your MPs who are worried, to the country as a
whole: Look, given - of course, that borrowing doesn't run away with itself and
all the rest of it - there will be more money. When we look at the next lot of
spending round next year, when we take a whole global view of the whole thing,
there is going to be more money. We're not going to restrict ourselves the way
we have done for the past couple of years, given that the finances continue to
improve, the way they have done.
DARLING: Well, there's two things I would say to
you and to all my colleagues. Firstly, we are creating and building a stable,
economic platform, which will provide the job opportunities, provide the
increase in growth that will provide the wealth that we all want to see in the
country for services and for the country as a whole. The second thing - so far
as the spending priorities are concerned - as I said to you the spending review
will be completed in the middle of next year - it will set out clearly the
objectives of this government for the rest of this Parliament and beyond and
that will inform the amount of money that we allocate to finance these
priorities.
HUMPHRYS: Yeah, but I could tell you now, and you
can tell me now can't you, you are going to need more money. If you want to do
what you want to do with education - going to do what you want to do with
education, with the health service, you know perfectly well - unless there is a
miracle - you're going to need more money. So, therefore, are you prepared to
say to people: yeah, we will spend that money - even if it means whatever,
borrowing a bit more, doing a bit more to this or that.
DARLING: No. What I'm saying to you is that by
identifying the priorities on the one hand and ensuring that we have a stable
economy on the other, we will ensure that there is adequate and sufficient
finances to ensure we can fund the programmes that we attach priority to. Now,
I think, that's as plain as can be to anybody. That process, of course, won't
be complete until next year.
HUMPHRYS: Alright, in the last couple of minutes,
let me turn to another subject that's in the newspapers this morning. The
opposition have called for a statement from the Treasury Minister, Geoffrey
Robinson, over stories that he has benefitted from funds that are in a fund in
Jersey, in Guernsey. Now, is it right that a) there ought to be this statement
in your view and b) that any Minister in a Labour Government should benefit in
such a way from what sounds on the basis of it like a sort of tax avoidance
scheme?
DARLING: No, it isn't that. Geoffrey Robinson
issued a full statement yesterday, which appears in some of the newspapers but
not all. Firstly, he has done what every other Cabinet Minister and other
Government Minister has done in this Government and the past:that where they
have shares and so on they put them into a blind trust.
HUMPHRYS: No, not necessarily in the Channel
Islands.
DARLING: No, no - that's one part of it. The
second part, so far as the-this trust in Guernsey is concerned, this is money
that was put into a trust by a Belgian lady living in Switzerland and over whom
the UK tax authorities could have had no jurisdiction.
HUMPHRYS: Well, indeed. It's a very complicated
business this but the...-
DARLING: Well, it so happens. Well, I was going
to put you right on one thing.
HUMPHRYS: Well, she bought shares that were in his
company and it becomes terribly complicated. All I'm trying to get from you is
the appearance of this thing is that here is a Treasury Minister in a Labour
Government who, one way or another, is benefitting from tax avoidance because
of funds that are in the Channel Islands. Now, is that right? That's what I'm
asking.
DARLING: Well, let me put you right on that
point. The money in this trust was not in the UK. It was not taken out of the
UK and put into this trust. As I say, this lady was Belgian. She lived in
Switzerland and she died three or four years ago. When she died the money was
put into a trust. So, it isn't, actually, avoiding UK taxes. The story in I
think, The Independent - is just wrong on that point. So, it's incomplete on
that point.
HUMPHRYS: So, there'll be a statement in the House
of Commons tomorrow?
DARLING: He's made a full statement and I may say
a much fuller statement than many ministers have made in the past. But, the
fact is that Geoffrey Robinson has complied with all the duties that are
incumbent upon him and those-What he has done has been approved by the
Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury, which is what, you know, he and other
ministers in the same position have done. So, you know, that's the end of it
really.
HUMPHRYS: Alistair Darling, thank you very much,
indeed.
DARLING: Thank you.
...oooOooo..
|