OTR HOME INTERVIEWS PEOPLE BEHIND THE SCENES MORE POLITICS BRAINTEASER CROCODILE NEWS BBC NEWS ONLINE |
Interview with Alistair Darling |
................................................................................ ON THE RECORD ALISTAIR DARLING INTERVIEW RECORDED FROM TRANSMISSION BBC-1 DATE: 30.11.97 ................................................................................ JOHN HUMPHRYS: Paul Wilenius reporting there. Alistair Darling, how are you going to respond. How is the Government going to respond to those MPs who want you to loosen the purse strings a bit? ALISTAIR DARLING: Well, we owe our election victory to a large extent to the fact that we promised to ensure that the public finances in this country will be put on a stable basis. Now we are not going to repeat the mistake of previous governments who came into office, started spending money and then had to rein in in the remaining part of the parliament, nor are we going to repeat the mistakes that Lord Lawson made in the 1980s when he completely misread the economic signals. He allowed the country to go on a binge which ended up in one of the deepest recessions we have seen this century. Our position is quite clear. We intend to overhaul the public finances to ensure that our priorities - the priorities that got us elected in May - are met, but we are going to ensure that the public finances are there and sustainable so that we can have the steady growth that people want to see and that we don't get into the 'boom and bust' cycle that we have seen in the past. HUMPHRYS: But those MPs have looked at the figures as well and they've seen what you've seen, which is that public borrowing next year is going to be half what the Treasury had expected to be, so there is a bit of money in the kitty - quite a lot of money in the kitty as far as they're concerned, and they think that you can afford it. You are saying to them 'absolutely not!' DARLING: At the moment, we spend some twenty five billion pounds a year on debt repayments. That's more than we spend on schools, for example, and at this stage in the economic cycle we should not be adding to debt - which is what was happening at the time of the last election because we were running a substantial deficit, nearly twenty two billion pounds last year. Gordon Brown in his budget in July made it clear that reducing debt over the next three years was very, very important because otherwise you just won't have the platform on which to build in the future. You know, if you allow debt to pile up when the economy is actually in recovery and when it is growing strongly, then you really are storing up problems for yourself in the future were there to be a slow-down at that time and my colleagues - the vast majority of whom I think accept this, know that the priority of this Government is to ensure we get stability so that we can get sustainable growth in the public services that everyone wants to see. You know, if I could just mention of course, you know, since the election you shouldn't overlook the fact that despite the constraints upon us, despite the fact that we are having to take some tough decisions, we have actually put nearly four billion pounds into health and education this year and next. Money that would not have been there but for the change of Government. HUMPHRYS: I don't know where you get this 'vast majority of the MPs' from. I mean, we've seen one hundred and twenty plus sign the letter to the Chancellor; I talked to one at the weekend, Roger Berry, who said he hadn't come across a single MP who supports what you are doing as far as single mothers is concerned, and there is a huge number of them out there who are opposed to what you are doing and they've seen the same figures that you have seen. They are not fools, are they? DARLING: Yes, I was watching the BBC news all day yesterday when I was told that there were two hundred MPs rising up. By the end of the day it appeared there were precisely four at the meeting referred to and that Roger had engaged in some speculation as to just how many might be behind him. HUMPHRYS: Well, there were one hundred and twenty plus who signed the letter, I mean that's a matter of record, isn't it. DARLING: A number of my colleagues asked the Chancellor to ensure that so far as the changes to the lone parents benefit was concerned that it should be phased in with the improvements they were making in the Welfare to Work Scheme, providing childcare places for lone parents to help them go to work. And now we've done that, we've brought forward, as Gordon Brown announced last week the Welfare to Work Programme which will provide one million places for children, enabling lone parents to get into work. Now, if I can just make a rather important point here which is sometimes overlooked in these things: the present welfare system isn't working, everybody knows that. It was designed over half a century ago for an entirely different workplace. Women now comprise the majority of the workforce, nearly a fifth of families in this country are headed by lone parents and only forty per cent work. Now, one of the reasons that only forty per cent work is because when you speak to lone parents they will say, 'well I can't get anyone to help with the childcare' or 'it is too expensive and it doesn't make work worthwhile'. So the whole strategy so far as our reforms are concerned is to do everything we can to encourage people and to help people get into work because in work you are far, far better off than you will ever be if you are relying totally on benefits. HUMPHRYS: Well, all those MPs know all about that, their letter came after all of these various proposals and what the Chancellor said in his Autumn statement and all the rest of it. That came at the weekend. DARLING: But actually most of the signatures went on before. You know, we all wander around lobbies and we all know what's going on. HUMPHRYS: But they sent the letter afterwards, I mean, they could have said 'look I now want to remove my signature because I heard the Chancellor', you know you are making it sound as though they are a terribly naive bunch. Maybe they are, but do you believe they are? DARLING: No, my colleagues are not at all naive. HUMPHRYS: Well, then they wouldn't have sent the letter if they didn't want to send the letter, would they? DARLING: I've explained to you what was in the letter and I've explained to you that the Government had already met that objective and I think you will find that the vast majority of my colleagues are united in the support for the Chancellor's determination to get a stable platform on which we can build in the future. I don't think anybody really wants to go back to the situation we've had in the past where previous Labour Governments - and Tory Governments - have made the mistake of spending money they couldn't afford to at the start of the Parliament to end up with cuts at the end. And they also support ... can I finish this important point? ... I think everybody also supports a major plank of our electoral platform which is to modernise the welfare state to help people get into work. We are doing that particularly as far as lone parents are concerned, we are also looking of course at other measures indicating the tax and benefits system. HUMPHRYS: Well fine - let me follow precisely that up, because what they're concerned about is that you are damaging your own long term plans. I mean you talk about the importance of getting people on welfare into work and nobody would dispute that, but what you are now doing by cutting these lone parent benefits is actually damaging that very aim - and that's the point, that's what they are so concerned about! DARLING: No, I don't think they are saying that at all. What we are doing is spending some three hundred million pounds... HUMPHRYS: Over the next many years possibly. This year it's only sixty million, let's be clear about that, that's confusing people. DARLING: You can't produce a million places, you know, instantly, but from April next year right across the country there will be places which will help lone parents get the childcare they want and they need to help them get into work. As I say, only forty per cent of lone parents work in this country, it's something like eighty per cent in France and in other countries it's generally higher and if you look at the pamphlets that the Treasury published last week on modernising the benefit and tax system, you will see that in there one of the main barriers preventing people from going to work is lack of childcare places. There are other barriers as well... HUMPHRYS: That's a factor, certainly. DARLING: ...you know, the impact of coming off benefit and coming into the tax system. Now, right across the board we are making improvements in the welfare system and there's various proposals now being worked up which will actually help people get into work and surely it must be the Government's objective - given the changed nature of the workplace, given the fact that people are going to be coming in and out of work, that we have one household in five with nobody in work, it must be the Government's objective to do everything it possibly can to help people get into work. HUMPHRYS: And my point to you is that you are not helping in that by cutting these benefits. You tell me to look at the latest Treasury pamphlet. What about looking at the statement that your own party put out just before the election about these particular benefits when you said - and I quote - "it is a Welfare to Work benefit, cutting it worsens the poverty trap". That's what you believed in April, the election was in May, then you changed your mind. DARLING: No. When we came into power there were all sorts of matters that we had to attend to, many of which we inherited. The government made its choice, the government has decided that its priority must be to help lone parents get into work. And I think that has, you know, the overwhelming support. HUMPHRYS: But you're not. That's the point I'm making. You're damaging that longterm aim, that's the whole point. It's what you said before the election. DARLING: We are helping lone parents and others, you know as well, get into work. Both by reforming the system as I said, providing the childcare places that are absolutely essential and also, you know, this is an important point, we are putting in hand substantial steps that will lessen the problem that people face coming off benefit, going into work when they end up paying effectively very high rates of tax. Those are important strands in our approach, they will be effective and they are being developed during the course of this parliament. I believe that what we are doing is absolutely right because it is giving people opportunity, opportunity that they have not had up until now. HUMPHRYS: But there will be less incentive. By your own declaration before the election, there will be less incentive for single mothers, lone parents, to get into work because some of them will be appreciably worse off. And all this is to save..you say three hundred million pounds, it's actually sixty million pounds over this next year during the time when you are in this self-imposed financial straitjacket. An extraordinary thing to do when you are going to have to borrow six billion pounds less than you thought you were going to have to borrow next year. DARLING: Well let me deal with the two parts of your question. Firstly the money, the money that is being allocated is coming from the Windfall Tax and from the new opportunities fund so it isn't effected by the overall general... HUMPHRYS: It's just accounting...change that around. DARLING: Well, no, it was made clear that, right from the start that's where the money was coming from. HUMPHRYS: That's where you said it had to come from. It didn't have to, it didn't matter how you slice the cake, does it. DARLING: Well where you raise money from does actually matter. But the point is we've made that money available and that money will be available starting from April. But the main point that you were raising there, is the fact that for many people work doesn't actually pay. Now, it's that problem that is the fundamental driver of all our reforms. That's why we, for example, want to provide more childcare places, that's why we want to move towards a starting rate of income tax of ten pence, when we can afford to do that because it lessens the barrier and the jolt that sometimes people can feel when they come off benefit and they go into work. We are looking at integration of the tax and benefit system because again that will make it more attractive for people to go into work. And we're looking at the working families' tax credit which again means that when people go into work, they will see the benefit of it. Now, this sort of reform just hasn't been looked at by any government in the past, you know our own included. And half a century on from the Beveridge reforms, of just the first Labour government in 1945, it is high time that we looked at these problems, we are tackling them, it will take some time to do it but we're well on the way to doing it. If you look at Gordon Brown's pre-Budget report last week, the whole thrust of it was creating the economic stability we need so that we can get..create the wealth in the first place that we need and the jobs that we need, and reforming the Welfare State to encourage people to get into work. HUMPHRYS: Are those cuts going to carry on after these two years are up. Are you...you won't be restoring them will you? DARLING: Well, I shall repeat the point that you shouldn't overlook. We've put more money into schools, more money into hospitals, there was a major boost to help pensioners last week. HUMPHRYS: That's not answering the question though is it. I was asking you a specific question. DARLING: I wouldn't want you to overlook that point. HUMPHRYS: Well you've made it already as you say. So perhaps you'd answer that question, will those cuts continue? DARLING: At the moment, as you know, the government is engaged in a complete review of all its spending. Every penny of the three hundred and twenty billion pounds that we spend, and at the end of that process, which will be completed next summer, we will set out our objectives, our priorities that we intend to meet for the rest of this parliament and beyond. At that time, we will determine how much the government is going to spend in the remaining part of this parliament. HUMPHRYS: Alright, in the very immediate future, the coal industry is in crisis, or so it tells us and many people believe to be the case. Are you going to help them out. There's a report this morning that you will help a little because otherwise an awful lot of mines are going to close, a lot of people are going to lose their jobs. DARLING: Well again, we've inherited a difficult legacy in that the last government almost prided itself in not having an energy policy. HUMPHRYS: Are you going to help them out is the question. DARLING: Well we've taken a number of steps which will help to ensure that coal has a level playing field . We've taken steps to stop the dumping of cheap coal in this country. We've removed the disadvantage that coal had as against nuclear - so far as the levy is concerned. And over the last few days there have been some encouraging signs. Remember, many of the other producers, the non-Budge producers, have already signed contracts with the generators. Budge himself has been making some progress over the last few days. HUMPHRYS: So no more help? DARLING: Our objective is to ensure that there is level playing fields. That coal isn't discriminated against because that's in no-one's interests. But you know as far as direct subsidy is concerned, which I don't think anyone's asking for, no that isn't our policy. HUMPHRYS: Well a little bit of price support in the meantime to tide him over because I recall, as you know doubt will, Robin Cook now Foreign Secretary, saying not that very long again, letting the pits close would be short-termism on a criminal scale. But you are telling me this morning that you are prepared to let those pits close are you? DARLING: No, what I'm saying to you is, the government has already announced a number of steps that will help the coal industry and to ensure that we do have a balanced energy policy. You know I have explained what we have done there, so far as the fossil levy is concerned, we've asked the regulators to look at the gas contracts, to ensure that there isn't a bias against coal. We're taking steps to ensure that we don't get the cheap coal that is dumped in this country at the present time. There's a whole range of things that the government can do. The tragedy is that we, of course, could only start this work when we got elected in May, when it really should have been done several years ago. HUMPHRYS: Can we look at the council spending round that is coming up this week, I was going to say next week, it's this week isn't it. Are you going to let the council spend more, or are you going to give them more so they don't have to raise local taxes. DARLING: John Prescott will be making a statement so far as English local authorities are concerned later this week. And I dare say I would get into great trouble if I told you what was in it. HUMPHRYS: Well what's the philosophy, what's the policy. DARLING: The philosophy is that local government, as with the whole of central government, has to stick with our overall policy which is to maintain a tight discipline over spending. And that philosophy applies to local authorities just as much as it applies to us. HUMPHRYS: There's going to be big cuts then aren't there. DARLING: Well, can I just - the important area of education, we've already taken steps to ensure, you know as I said to you earlier, that the extra billion pounds that we promised for schools, will actually be spent in the front line. So, in areas where there is the maximum priority, particularly so far as education is concerned, then we've already taken the steps that will ensure that that is delivered. But overall - can I just repeat this point - the reason that we are maintaining tight control of public spending, is because we are determined to avoid a situation where spending runs away from us, as has happened to governments in the past, and we then have to embark on severe retrenchment, you know three or four years down the line. We're not going to do that. HUMPHRYS: There will be more cuts then in local government spending over the next year. That's inevitable from what you just said isn't it, because they're going to get, what is it, one point six per cent or something, half the rate of inflation. DARLING: I'm not saying that. What I am saying.. HUMPHRYS: It's bound to be isn't it. I mean you get more money for education, you're not going to get more money for anything else, therefore - you don't have to be a mathematical genius to work it out, they're not going to have the money to spend are they, there will be cuts. DARLING: I was making the point that there will be more money for education next year. The other point that I was making is that John Prescott will be making a statement in the House of Commons, which is the right place to make it this week. HUMPHRYS: But, there is not going to be more money. You made that clear because you started your answer by saying: we're going to be firm. DARLING: Yes, and I can repeat that. That is giving no secret away. This government is determined to maintain tight control of public spending and at the moment you know within that, of course, many of my colleagues, you know David Blunkett is a very good example of this; has been able to reallocate money, for example, into further education, which has benefitted. I just think the point is worth making that since we've been elected, we have been able through scrutinising the money the government already spends to start delivering on those matters which we attach great importance to, such as further education. That money was reallocated and partly benefits from the fact that unemployment has been falling. That money has been reallocated, so that it will help further education. We've done the same in health, we've done the same in schools. We are making progress but, as we said, during the course of the Election, which is one of the reasons why we got elected with such a huge majority is that it would take time to turn around the situation we inherited. HUMPHRYS: So, let's- DARLING: We've only been in power for six months but- HUMPHRYS: Alright. DARLING: -we are making substantial progress, progress that would not have been made had it not been for the change of government. HUMPHRYS: And you restricted your spending to the last government spending figures for these next two years. Now, when those two years are up, can you say to your MPs who are worried, to the country as a whole: Look, given - of course, that borrowing doesn't run away with itself and all the rest of it - there will be more money. When we look at the next lot of spending round next year, when we take a whole global view of the whole thing, there is going to be more money. We're not going to restrict ourselves the way we have done for the past couple of years, given that the finances continue to improve, the way they have done. DARLING: Well, there's two things I would say to you and to all my colleagues. Firstly, we are creating and building a stable, economic platform, which will provide the job opportunities, provide the increase in growth that will provide the wealth that we all want to see in the country for services and for the country as a whole. The second thing - so far as the spending priorities are concerned - as I said to you the spending review will be completed in the middle of next year - it will set out clearly the objectives of this government for the rest of this Parliament and beyond and that will inform the amount of money that we allocate to finance these priorities. HUMPHRYS: Yeah, but I could tell you now, and you can tell me now can't you, you are going to need more money. If you want to do what you want to do with education - going to do what you want to do with education, with the health service, you know perfectly well - unless there is a miracle - you're going to need more money. So, therefore, are you prepared to say to people: yeah, we will spend that money - even if it means whatever, borrowing a bit more, doing a bit more to this or that. DARLING: No. What I'm saying to you is that by identifying the priorities on the one hand and ensuring that we have a stable economy on the other, we will ensure that there is adequate and sufficient finances to ensure we can fund the programmes that we attach priority to. Now, I think, that's as plain as can be to anybody. That process, of course, won't be complete until next year. HUMPHRYS: Alright, in the last couple of minutes, let me turn to another subject that's in the newspapers this morning. The opposition have called for a statement from the Treasury Minister, Geoffrey Robinson, over stories that he has benefitted from funds that are in a fund in Jersey, in Guernsey. Now, is it right that a) there ought to be this statement in your view and b) that any Minister in a Labour Government should benefit in such a way from what sounds on the basis of it like a sort of tax avoidance scheme? DARLING: No, it isn't that. Geoffrey Robinson issued a full statement yesterday, which appears in some of the newspapers but not all. Firstly, he has done what every other Cabinet Minister and other Government Minister has done in this Government and the past:that where they have shares and so on they put them into a blind trust. HUMPHRYS: No, not necessarily in the Channel Islands. DARLING: No, no - that's one part of it. The second part, so far as the-this trust in Guernsey is concerned, this is money that was put into a trust by a Belgian lady living in Switzerland and over whom the UK tax authorities could have had no jurisdiction. HUMPHRYS: Well, indeed. It's a very complicated business this but the...- DARLING: Well, it so happens. Well, I was going to put you right on one thing. HUMPHRYS: Well, she bought shares that were in his company and it becomes terribly complicated. All I'm trying to get from you is the appearance of this thing is that here is a Treasury Minister in a Labour Government who, one way or another, is benefitting from tax avoidance because of funds that are in the Channel Islands. Now, is that right? That's what I'm asking. DARLING: Well, let me put you right on that point. The money in this trust was not in the UK. It was not taken out of the UK and put into this trust. As I say, this lady was Belgian. She lived in Switzerland and she died three or four years ago. When she died the money was put into a trust. So, it isn't, actually, avoiding UK taxes. The story in I think, The Independent - is just wrong on that point. So, it's incomplete on that point. HUMPHRYS: So, there'll be a statement in the House of Commons tomorrow? DARLING: He's made a full statement and I may say a much fuller statement than many ministers have made in the past. But, the fact is that Geoffrey Robinson has complied with all the duties that are incumbent upon him and those-What he has done has been approved by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury, which is what, you know, he and other ministers in the same position have done. So, you know, that's the end of it really. HUMPHRYS: Alistair Darling, thank you very much, indeed. DARLING: Thank you. ...oooOooo.. |