Interview with Michael Heseltine




       
       
       
 
 
 
 
................................................................................
 
                                ON THE RECORD 
 
 
RECORDED FROM TRANSMISSION BBC-1                                   DATE: 6.2.94 
................................................................................
 
JOHN HUMPHRYS:                         Good afternoon, and welcome to On The 
Record.  In today's programme, we take the temperature of the Tory Party in 
Parliament.  What is the mood of the Backbenchers?   
 
DAVID WILSHIRE MP:                     The mood is right across the spectre  
from total paranoia and panic, on the one hand, to a sort of genteel 
resignation and acceptance on the other.  
 
HUMPHRYS:                              So, I shall be asking Michael Heseltine 
if it's time to say to the Prime Minister: Come out of Number Ten, your time is 
up.  And, we've a report from inside Sinn Fein, on the prospects for peace in  
Northern Ireland.  They're not good.  But, first, the troubles of the Tory 
Party and its luckless leader.  Every time Mr Major calls for unity, the 
internecine warfare seems to break out again.   
 
                                       On Tuesday, he won some Brownie points 
for being tough, when he told a deputation of Right Wingers: I'm in charge, and 
promptly showed them the door.  Two days later, he invited himself to a meeting 
of Backbenchers, read the riot act and won himself a lot of desk banging and a 
clutch of good headlines.  It didn't last long.  Michael Portillo's foreigner 
bashing speech saw to that.   
 
                                       Has Mr Major, then, lost control of his 
Party, or is all got up by the Press?  Kim Catcheside reports. 
 
***** 
 
                      

HUMPHRYS:                              Kim Catheside with the Tory faithful 
and not so faithful. Earlier today I spoke to Michael Heseltine near his 
country home.  I asked him first if he or any other members of the Cabinet 
were thinking the unthinkable? 
 
MICHAEL HESELTINE:                     Certainly not, except in terms of 
looking at policies wherever there's an opportunity to see how we can improve, 
take the message and the action further forward.  That's what a government is 
about.  I believe that what John Major is doing is a very important act of 
leadership.  I think he will be seen to have delivered a very remarkable 
package of reforms and I have no doubt whatsoever that he will win the next 
general election. 
 
JOHN HUMPHRYS:                         But there are many people who are 
concerned about his leadership. 
 
HESELTINE:                             They always are.  That is part of 
politics.  I've been through it so many times under various Conservative Prime 
Ministers, there's always the mid-term blues and the interesting thing that it 
isn't just characteristic of Britain, it's very difficult to think of a 
government in broadly a similar economy which isn't in much the same sort of 
difficulty and the reason is there staring you in the face.  We've had arguably 
the longest recession since the 1930s, in those circumstances there is a 
malaise in public opinion, people are disenchanted, they're worried about their 
own prospects, their own futures, their own lives, they switch off from the 
government of the day whatever party it comes from.  The idea that 
Conservatives are somehow uniquely unpopular just doesn't stand up to scrutiny 
of what happened recently in France, what's happening in Spain. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Mid-term blues is one thing but we're 
talking here, Peter Wiltshire..David Wilshire was talking here about a mood 
that swings from total paranoia and panic to genteel resignation, that's more 
than mid-term blues, isn't it? 
 
HESELTINE:                             Look frankly, I mean I haven't given up 
my Sunday morning to sort of indulge in the sort of tittle-tackle of politics, 
I'm interested....you can do those interviews, you can cut, you can 
juxtaposition, you can take ten million interviews, put them into one 
sentence.  I've no idea what the questions were, what the context was, but I 
know how you make your programmes.  What I'm concerned with, which is very 
simple, is to explain why I believe that what John Major is doing requires 
strong leadership and is very important and very fundamental for the way in 
which the Conservative Party is evolving in the face of a rapidly changing 
world. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              I think we're agreeing, aren't we, that 
what the country is... 
 
HESELTINE:                             That's going to be a very boring, 
very boring programme if we're agreeing this early on. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Up to a point Lord Copper, that what 
everybody needs and everybody wants is strong leadership - your phrase - the 
question is whether that is what they believe they're getting and manifestly 
from the interviews that we've done and a lot of other things, a lot of people 
feel that is what they're not getting and that is a problem, that's a serious 
problem, isn't it, that's not just tittle-tattle? 
 
HESELTINE:                             It's a serious problem if, in fact, you 
put it in a context which is of the moment, as opposed to in the context of, 
first what we've seen happen in the past and secondly, in the context of a 
parliament.  I don't know of a political leader who has not gone through this 
sort of crisis in mid-term but above all else, I know this, that if the leader 
doesn't keep his nerve or her nerve and weather the storm and stick with the 
policies and the principles and the philosphies, then they would find it 
difficult to account satisfactorily but I know enough about John Major to know 
that he intends to do just that and rightly so. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              You use the word crisis. 
 
HESELTINE:                             I only use the word crisis in the sense 
that one is looking at a position where the party is now behind in opinion 
polls and obviously that is something we have to address but I don't regard 
that as a crisis in the sense that is something we can't cope with, because as
I've made the point several times alreay, I've seen this happen so many times 
before. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But isn't it also a crisis where members 
of the government and Mr Wilshire after all, is a member of the government, 
are so manifestly disenchanted with the leadership? 
 
HESELTINE:                             Well I don't believe that you will find 
that that is the general position, but I have absolutely infinite faith in the 
ability of the newspapers or the media to select quotations to give an 
impression.  What I know perfectly well is that the Conservative Party is 
determined to fight whenever it fights elections and that it is united by the 
broad economic and philosophical thrust of its policies.  And there's no way 
which I'm going to sit here as a member of John Major's Cabinet and sort of 
wallow in the mire of despond.  What I am in the business of doing is 
explaining to Conservatives that we have a programme, that we have to keep our 
nerve and that when we come to account when it matters at the time of the next 
election, I believe we can win. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Why are so many people wallowing then, 
why is Mr Major not able to get across that message? 
 
HESELTINE:                             I've explained that very clearly, all 
political leaders with similar economic circumstances are in very similar 
situations and they always are.  Once the economy is in the sort of 
difficulties that world recession has imposed upon so many similar countries, 
the people switch off, they are not listening, they are preoccupied by their 
own problems and anything that goes wrong for the government is a sort of 
release of tension in that it focuses their discontent on that particular 
issue. 
 
                                       It's very interesting, if I give you one 
example of how this can be reversed in favourable economic circumstances.  I 
suppose the American President has now got problems of allegations of one sort 
or another that he faces which are in every way more difficult than those which 
we've seen recently in this country and yet his popularity is in fact buoyed up 
by the state of the American economy.  Whereas in our country, the problems of 
the last month, which are transitory, in fact, seem to overwhelm the overall 
economic strategy of the government. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              And you can understand that as far as 
ordinary voters are concerned, people who don't understand politics, people who 
can't quite understand what's going on.  But as far as your own MPs are 
concerned, members of your own government, isn't that a bit puzzling that 
they're wallowing in this slough of despond that you describe? 
 
HESELTINE:                             Not at all.  Look, democracies are 
immensely sensitive, people think that politicians are out of touch, they think 
parliament and governments don't listen.  It's absolutely not true, there is an 
immense vibrancy between the body politic and the general public and it's all 
revealed by Press comment, by MPs saying what they say, by the sort of 
conversations you and I are having.  But can I just make the first point that I 
made to you.  This is a totally wasted interview from my point of view because 
what I want to talk about is the way in which the philosophy and the policies 
of this government are relevant and how they will carry us through.  That's 
what matters.  I tell you that today is not an important day in the life of a 
government.  The important day in the life of a government comes when we have 
to account for our stewardship and that's the point that is relevant. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But you're going to have to account in 
all sorts of ways quite soon.  I mean you've got very important elections 
coming up; Local government elections and European elections. 
 
HESELTINE:                             We'll fight those elections to win, we 
always fight to win as the only approach you can possibly adopt.  And we will 
put candidates in the field, we'll put resources behind them, we'll all be out 
there campaigning for them.  We'll fight as hard as we know how, with all the 
weapons at our disposal.  Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, we don't want 
to erect great hurdles as to what the benchmark should be. 
 
                                       But the test that really comes is the 
general election and a governemnt that tried to win every election - every 
by-election, every local government election, once a year, by and large - or 
every European election, would actually all the time be shoving a thermometer 
in its mouth and taking short term decisions with no strategic objective and no 
long term fulfilment. 
 
                                       Why I'm absolutely confident that John 
Major's leadership will be seen to be as creditable as I believe it to be, is 
that he has got exactly that long term strategy in mind.  He is bringing about 
fundamental reforms in very difficult areas of this country which have been 
neglected for too long and I think that they will be seen to have been the 
important reforms to help Britain face the ever growing competition that the 
changing world circumstances is thrusting upon us.  
 
HUMPHRYS:                              He may or may not, have a long term 
strategy, does he have time, that certainly is time.... 
 
HESELTINE:                             Just let's look at the hard economics.  
Britain is leading Europe out of recession.  Productivity is up, industrial 
relations are excellent, interest rates are down, inflation is down.  Interest 
rate productions alone have taken thirteen billion pounds off the costs of 
industry.  One of the things about the tax increases which Ken Clarke rightly 
has had to introduce to deal with the public deficit, is that they will be in 
part offset by the fact that something about two and a half million people with 
mortgages are about to get a significant reduction in their interest rate 
bills.  Plus, of course, the fact that significant numbers of people are 
getting rebates on their electricity bills. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              All of that may be true and given enough 
time, no doubt people would say, 'fine, yes, I can see the economy's improving 
and it's helping me personally', but you've got these important elections 
coming up and between now and then you've got substantial tax increases, people 
aren't going to start benefitting from lower inflation, from lower unemployment 
between now and then, what they're going to see is that they're going to be 
worse off in the short term and that's how people respond, to the short term, 
by and large, isn't it?  You're an experienced politician, you know that,  if 
you feel worse off at the time of an election, you're likely to vote against 
the government. 
 
HESELTINE:                             The question for the Prime Minister is 
this:  What is right for the country and what is right for the country is that 
we keep the economy on the steady expansionary mode which we have now achieved. 
That we take the right decisions to maintain the low level of inflation, the 
low interest rates which we have achieved.  That's the right decision, that is 
what leadership is about.  If he were to say, oh, no, no, what we've got to do 
is the media bit, worried old boy, so let's sort of monkey around, let's 
simulate demand, let's let the thing go and try and win a few more seats round 
the place.  That would be wet and weak, and he won't do it.   
 
                                       So the fact of the matter is that the 
very thing you're looking for, which is leadership, is being displayed.  You  
don't like it because, of course, it is not bowing to the mood created by the 
recession that there has to be change, gimmicks, quick fixes.  It's not 
possible, he won't do it. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              It might be wet and weak but it's also 
high risk, isn't it, because if people don't feel better off, they're not going 
to vote for you. 
 
HESELTINE:                             But if you're Prime Minister, if you're 
Prime Minister, frankly, your preoccupation is to deliver the promise and that 
can only be done in this context, in the context of a parliament.  You do not 
divert yourself down by-ways in order to be preoccupied by interim elections, 
however important they may be and certainly they have to be fought very 
toughly. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But you've got to persuade you're own 
members of that, haven't you, the people who may or may not mount some sort of 
challenge against Mr Major eventually.  It may not happen, of course, but Peter 
Temple-Morris, you heard him in that film saying that the patience of everyone 
will run out as time goes by if things don't get better.   This is the last 
session of parliament when we can afford the luxury of comparative failure. 
 
HESELTINE:                             But he'll be as thrilled as I am of the 
evidence of the statistics.  We've just had a recent CBI survey showing the 
highest business confidence since 1983, and that is buoyed up by the record 
level of exports and the interest rates and the industrial relations figures.  
All of these things, it's coming through, Britain is ahead of the European 
recovery and what we've now got to do is to keep our nerve, not be diverted and 
I haven't the slightest doubt that every Conservative member of parliament 
knows that. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But it isn't happening quickly enough 
for you, is it?  That's the problem, you are twenty per cent behind in the 
polls, not withstanding everything you've told me.  
 
HESELTINE:                             But the logic of your question is that 
somehow or other we should accelerate it and that's exactly the disaster which
the Prime Minister will not tolerate.  
 
HUMPHRYS:                              No the logic of my question - if there 
is one to it - is that there's actually not very much you can do now because, 
of course, you can't accelerate it and that's why Mr Major is in difficulty.  
 
HESELTINE:                             There is a very important thing we 
can do and that is to keep our nerve and explain our case.  That's why 
programmes like this are important.  
 
HUMPHRYS:                              You've been doing that. 
 
HESELTINE:                             Sure. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              You've been doing it for so long.  
 
HESELTINE:                             But you have to keep on doing it.  You 
have to keep on doing it and you must not be deflected by the thermometer 
process of public opinion on a day to day basis.  In the end, public opinion 
comes to respect people who deliver results and that's what we have to do and 
all the signs are there that as long as we don't lose our nerve, those results 
will come through.   I think that, I have to say it, I think the economic 
factors today facing the British economy are about as encouraging as I can ever 
remember, providing we don't do what has happened, time and again, since the 
war, when the currency has been devalued, which is to let inflation overrun our 
expectations. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But public opinion also respects and 
indeed demands, not to mention opinion within parliament, strong leadership 
and Mr Major's problem seems to be that he isn't seen to be exerting that 
strong leadership, rightly or wrongly.  
 
HESELTINE:                             You're now ignoring the fact that in 
every other country for whatever the reasons, but the same thing unites the 
reasons, every other leader has got the same situation.  Chancellor 
Kohl.... 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Oh, Mr Balladur is doing terribly well 
in France.... 
 
HESELTINE:                             Yes, yes, but well, is he.  We'll have 
to see about that, but you have President Mitterrand who is the lightning 
conductor because he is associated with a Socialist government which was 
recently defeated in France, but nobody questions that Chancellor Kohl is a 
strong leader.   Look at the position of his standing in German politics today, 
a very strong leader,  but recession and therefore all the flak.   
 
                                       Look what's happened in Japan, the 
Liberal Democratic Party, forty years of power upset because of the economic 
circumstances there, so the fact of the matter is that it is very difficult to 
persuade people to focus on this, it is that economic situation, characterising 
all broadly similar economies to our own except America, who's ahead of the 
race, that is causing this unease,  but we are coming out of it earlier and 
therefore we will see a recovery in our political fortunes earlier. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              The trouble is every time Mr Major tries 
to reassert his leadership he seems to get blown off course doesn't he? 
 
HESELTINE:                             Well, not true actually.  He did 
actually have a very much better moment before Christmas and then events of 
various sorts blew up, but they were not within his ... yes, fine, but then 
that's politics and you don't want to believe for a minute that life is always 
like that.  You get the bad moments, you get the good moments.   You must not 
be in the position where you run your government on a day to day basis, you've 
got to have a strategy, and it's because, and this is the interesting thing to 
me about John Major, is that he has got a very clear understanding of how the 
anxieties of the British people affected as they are by this shrinking world, 
by the globalisation of markets, by the telecommunications and communications 
revolution, but the internationalisation of so much, how people are uneasy.  So 
his strategy is to try and  push back to the people power, then you see it 
everywhere, you see it in deregulation, you see it in Citizen's Charter, you 
see it in the competitiveness exercise that we're about to take on, you saw 
it in the policy of Back to Basics.  It's about empowering the people and the 
interesting thing about that is where does that idea come from, it's straight 
down the line of Disraelian philosophy, the condition of the people.  Now that 
is what John Major is doing.   
 
                                       Let me give you some examples, the 
teacher and training programmes.  We are trying to give to parents and to 
schools the power over their own destiny, publishing results, giving parents 
the entitlement to reports about the education of their children.  It's 
happening in housing for example, more and more people owning their own homes.  
We're trying to encourage small businesses.  More and more people to own their 
own businesses in order to give people a bigger stake in society.  That is what 
people want and as long as we can deliver the economic process whereby they 
gain from that, as they will over the years ahead, then I believe that the 
Conservative re-election is assured and the triumph will be John Major who saw 
the need to encapsulate this frustration and to find policies to meet it. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But you're not going to achieve all of 
those things unless you're seen to be as a government, and Mr Major as a 
leader, firmly in charge.   There comes a point doesn't there when people look 
at the leader and say: you, know, he can, for instance, he can't keep going to 
the backbenchers and making this sort of plea, this demand, this insistence 
that they toe the line - the headline that says one day "Major Cracks the Whip" 
and the next day "Major's back in trouble again".   This just can't go on. 
 
HESELTINE:                             You're back on the tittle-tattle 
of politics. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              No, but .... 
 
HESELTINE::                            Can I just - can I just remind you of 
1981.  Around that time Mrs Thatcher had lost control of her cabinet on public 
expenditure, she'd lost control of the ability to reach a negotiation of the 
Falklands with the Argentinian government, where her policy was overturned by 
the backbenchers, she had had to accept that she couldn't face down the miners 
at the stage, and there was a very difficult economic circumstance and great 
anxiety at that moment.  She won the general election eighteen months, two 
years later.  Exactly the same sort of things were being said about being out 
of touch, not understanding, no leadership, all those things.  Actually within 
a very short period time the economic recovery brought the Tories to another 
triumphant victory. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              You could as well have given me the 
example of the last time Mrs Thatcher was in great trouble and a lot of people 
said, "Oh, she'll ride it out, she'll ride it out, no problems, it's all 
exaggerated, it's the tittle-tattle of politics", and she was thrown out of 
office. 
 
HESELTINE:                             Well, that's a judgement that some of us 
had to make at the time, but that's history, I've no intention of investigating 
or revisiting that particular issue in this programme now. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But, but, no but I raise it you see 
because ... 
 
HESELTINE:                             I think there's a world of difference 
between someone who'd been in power for a very long period of time and John 
Major, who's been there for a very short period of time.  I'll give you another 
example, can I just deal with the European thing because it's very interesting. 
John Major steered in my view brilliantly the Maastricht negotiations with the 
overwhelming endorsement of parliament and the Conservative Party.  All sorts 
of people protested.  He kept his nerve, he saw the treaty ratified.  Now I 
call that strong leadership.  Other people say, "Oh well, he should have bowed, 
he should have given in, he should have listened to the party".   That would 
have been weak leadership.  There's no question about it that John Major in the 
Maastricht negotiations changed forty years of European process.  The 
centralism that had dominated the European movement from the nineteen-forties 
onward was checked and in the respect of parts of it actually reversed.  That's 
very strong leadership. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But not withstanding that, you still 
have deep divisions within the parties, you still have factions within the 
parties who are as it were, almost preparing for a leadership contest.  You 
heard what was said on that film there, and that's got to be worrying for Mr 
Major.   That's got to make it difficult for him to carry on. 
 
HESELTINE:                             I don't think that there were factions 
preparing for a leadership contest.  I haven't the slightest doubt that if you 
go round the bars of the House of Commons you can get people to talk about 
these things, but that is just the tittle-tattle of politics.  I don't believe 
there's substance in it, I don't believe there's going to be a challenge to 
John Major. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              It's one thing to talk in the bars but 
it's another thing to sit in front of the television camera and say so isn't 
it? 
 
HESELTINE:                             It depends entirely on the sort of 
questions were asked.  I've no idea what questions were asked, I've no idea 
of the length of the interview or how these things have been juxtaposed, and 
that's why these sort of clippings programmes are so difficult.  I've found it 
myself time and again, where I've done an interview, twenty minutes of 
questions, thirty second sound-bite. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Yes, but you're a - if I may so, a wily 
old bird, perhaps not that old, but as are so many of the people we interviewed 
in that film there.  They know perfectly well what they're saying, you know and 
I know and everybody else knows there's a kind of code in politics that you 
speak in, and it's quite clear what a lot of them are saying, indeed Peter 
Temple Morris: loyalty to John Major as far as they are concerned, 
meaning the right wing of the party means more time for their people, its 
sincerity is extremely hollow, they're waiting for their man as it were to be 
ready, and then he went on to say, "We don't scheme, but if necessary we are 
ready to act. 
 
HESELTINE:                             I have a very simple and very boring 
rule.  I never analyse or criticise or comment on my colleagues in parliament 
and it doesn't get me into trouble and it's a very sensible thing to do.  So 
you won't get me - I'm very fond of Peter Temple Morris... 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              And he's very a credible figure.  
 
HESELTINE:                             He's a very credible figure, but I'm 
also very fond of all sorts of people on the right wing of politics, and they 
do have this fun and games amongst themselves - there is a sort of great debate 
that goes on.  The interesting thing about that actually, the real interesting 
thing is what's the debate on the Labour Party side?  There isn't one.  What's 
their contribution to politics? They haven't got one, they've got no views, 
they've got no policies, they've got no philosophy, all they've got is 
"Me-tooism". 
 
HUMPHYRS:                              Yes, but they're not in power, you are. 
 
HESELTINE:                             You've got sort of John Smith like a 
sort of anxious undertaker, wringing his hands trying to pretend he's a modern 
day Tory, and it's a sort of pathetic performance really.  The whole debate in 
politics today is on the right wing of politics.  How you do this, how you 
involve people, how you become more competitive, how you drive the economies 
forward, how far you can take privatisation, how you can encourage people to 
own shares and houses, and all of these things, it's all on the right wing of 
politics all over the world, and that's the reversal of what - thirty years ago 
I can remember Anthony Wedgewood Benn talking about the irreversibility of 
socialism.  In the grand old province of China today it's sixty-five per cent 
capitalist and they call themselves Communists. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              But what some of your members are now 
saying is "Look, we can't actually have this real debate about where we're 
going and the kind of policies we ought to be working towards while we're under 
pressures of government as we are at the moment.  Perhaps we ought to go into 
opposition for a period and then we can get it all together again.  It worked 
for us from '74 to '79, perhaps we ought to do it again"
 
HESLELTINE:                            Well, interestingly enough, the big 
changes that took place in the 1979 government took place after we came to 
government. 
 
HUMPHYRS:                              Yes, but some of the ideas were born.  
One of them was yours as I recall - council house sales. 
 
HESELTINE:                             Oh, of course, yes, of course, but.. 
that didn't come up in
 
HUMPHRYS:                              You dreamt that up in opposition. 
 
HESELTINE:                             That didn't come up in 1974-9.  That was 
already high on the list of Conservative experience in local government before 
1974, on a voluntary basis.  All that happened in 1974-9 when I was responsible 
for policy is we decided to make it a statutary right, but on the big  
privatisation issue which is perhaps arguably one the most important changes we 
made, a vital change, actually we were elected in '79 to manage the public 
sector more effectively.  It was after the sale of council houses that we moved 
to the sale of other industrial and commercial activities. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              So you disagree with John Biffen then.  
He said that was a remarkably successful brain-storming exercise, and the 
implication of what he said was pretty obvious. 
 
HESELTINE:                             Well, I can tell you why it was 
remarkably successful, we won the election. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Yes, but you came up with the ideas to 
enable you to win that election, you got the party together. 
 
HESELTINE:                             But it would be wrong to suggest that 
somehow or other we had found a huge new raft of ideas in 1974-79.   What we 
did was to re-articulate the basic Tory ideas and extend them in council house 
sales and to industrial relations policy which we'd been pursuing before, but 
above all else we had a Labour government and people realised there were no 
cosy soft options.  The winter of discontent, rampant inflation, huge public 
debts, that's what actually gave us the background against which the
Conservatives were elected. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              So you disagree then with David Wilshire 
who says there are fund ... 
 
HESELTINE:                             You're not going to get me, no, no, no, 
you've not going to get me to pick off one colleague after another.  They're 
all my colleagues. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Ignore the names, if we can disagree 
with the notion then, forget that it was David Wilshire who said it, a junior 
member of the government.  The fundamental issue's only ultimately capable of 
very radical change when we're able to think without the pressures of 
government. 
 
HESELTINE:                             Well, let me just go back to one issue.  
The Prime Minister enabled me to announce recently that we're going to 
produce a competitiveness White Paper.  Now I happen to think that's one of the 
more interesting things that any government that I can remember has announced 
its intention of doing.  It is to recognise that this country has to compete in 
the world of the next century, across the board in every field, and we're 
going to analyse how we can do that, and this is a very radical idea.  It is 
bringing detailed application of management to the public and the private 
sector, and it is an idea whose time has come.  That is not a product of 
opposition, that is a product of government. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              You talk about the tittle-tattle of 
politics, but let us make an assumption.   Let's assume that the pressure does 
continue on Mr Major, and that in the end either he decides that he wants to go 
or that there is a leadership election.  Now we've already heard some people on 
our film saying: We might turn to X-Y-or Z.   Are people going to say to you 
next time around, "Uh, well he's a bit you know - he's had his heart attack and 
Michael Heseltine's bound to be out of the game?" 
 
HESELTINE:                             Look, if that's all they say about me, I 
would be a very happy man because most of my life they've said things a great 
deal worse, but I think this thing is just barking.  I began the week with the 
Today programme, and they couldn't resist asking those sort of questions. 
 
HUMPHRYS:                              Well, you've done it before so
we assume you've going to do it again. 
 
HESELTINE:                             Six days later you're back on it.  The 
real thing is that I will help John Major in any way he asks me to to try and 
sustain and improve his position as premier of this country.  We were once 
involved as rivals, he won, I respect that position, and my interest now is 
serving in his government and above all else getting him and the Conservatives 
re-elected at the next election, and if you want a small bet on the result I'm 
your man. 
 
HUMPHYRS:                              Michael Heseltine, I might take you up 
on that, thank you.
 

 
                                ...oooOooo...