Angry Scenes in the Commons as Major Accuses Blair of 'Broken Promises'
The Prime Minister has been accused by John Major, the leader of the Opposition, of breaking his promise to publish devolution Bills for Scotland and Wales before people are asked to vote on the plans in a referendum.
Tony Blair defended his decision to publish only a White Paper on devolution before the referendums are held in the autumn. During angry scenes in the Commons at Question Time, Mr Blair said that this was "plainly the most sensible way to proceed".
The second of the new-style 30-minute Prime Minister's question times gave Mr Major the opportunity for a prolonged assault on Labour's devolution plans.
Mr Major Opens the Batting
"Three weeks ago you promised the devolution Bill would be published before
the referendum. Is that still the case?"
Mr Blair replied "The proposals will of course be published because it is that upon which the referendum is to be held."
Mr Major pressed the Prime Minister again, "I asked whether the Bill would be published, for you said some time ago, `Of course the Bill will be published in time for the referendum, because the referendum will take place on those proposals'.
"Why have you changed your mind? And if you've changed your mind, why didn't
you have the courtesy to come and tell the House...for the distinction between the White Paper and the Bill will be well understood by the House and you. Wasn't it a matter of trust that you told us?"
Mr Blair said the position was absolutely clear "that it is the White Paper proposals that will be put to a referendum of the Scottish people.
"Wriggling and Wobbling"
The former Prime Minister again quoted Mr Blair's promise from the Queen's Speech debate last month that the Bill would be published in time for the referendum, accusing Mr Blair of "wriggling and wobbling".
"Isn't it the truth that the details of this policy are still in such a muddle
that you cannot yet give detailed instructions to the draftsmen?"
Mr Blair replied "It is plainly sensible and right and in accordance with precisely what we said before the election that we will publish those proposals."
"Fingers in the Till . . ."
Mr Major came back again, demanding, "Why don't you admit that you made a
mistake in the past and the Bill isn't ready? Why don't you admit you've been caught with your fingers in the till, oratorically. You promised the Bill and you can't deliver the Bill.
"Isn't this a contemptible way after one month of Government for you to treat
the House of Commons and isn't it becoming apparent that this is typical of the
arrogant way in which this Government behaves?"
To further Tory jeers and with Speaker Betty Boothroyd struggling to restore
order, Mr Blair said: "In relation to fingers in the till, I really don't think
that's a lesson we need from the Conservative Party."
"I Have Done a Little Research . . ."
Mr Blair said that by tabling more than 250 amendments to the Referendum Bill,
the Conservatives had tried to "scupper" the legislation.
"As for use of the guillotine, I have done a little research. The previous
Conservative Government used the guillotine 59 times, six times they did so in
advance of the committee stage.
"They are saying they never did it with constitutional Bills. They did it on
the Single European Act and when they enforced the poll tax on Scotland.
Accusing the Prime Minister of "waffle", Mr Major asked: "Why did you
promise the House the Bill would be published?
"Why did you make that promise and why haven't you now apologised that you
have broken that promise?"
Mr Blair said: "The promise that I made is precisely the promise that we made
at the election."
He repeated that Mr Dewar had promised the White Paper would be published
before the House rises. "That is his position, that is my position.
"The Tories, with all their shouting and braying, want to stop us carrying
out the mandate upon which we were elected and we won't let them stop us."
Later, Downing Street sources acknowledged that the Prime Minister should
not have mentioned the Bill in the passage quoted by Mr Major and had allowed a
"misunderstanding" to develop.
|