|
Tony Benn, predicting a national government based on the centre ground of politics
|
Lib Dem Offer Signals End of Labour, Says Benn
The Government's move to offer Liberal Democrats seats on a Cabinet committee is "the beginning of the end" of the Labour Party, according to the veteran left-wing Labour MP Tony Benn.
Mr Benn predicted Labour would be replaced by a centre-party operating on a different basis. "You could imagine really a national government being set up and the Labour Party simply being replaced," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
He said measures such as revising Clause 4 and distancing Labour from the
trade unions were really a preparation for a party
similar to the US Democrats.
"It's been presented as modernisation and reform. Actually it is complete
realignment of British politics," he claimed.
National Government
The former Cabinet minister pointed out that current proposals for reform would mean Labour constituency parties and trade unions would no longer be able
to submit motions to party conference. Yet Liberal Democrats would be able to put an item on the agenda for the consultative Cabinet committee.
"I think people are realising that this is a much bigger thing than appeared
from Tuesday's statement when no announcement was made in Parliament; it was
just assumed that it was all right," Mr Benn said.
Tony Benn speaking on the Todayprogramme
Dur 6' 00"
He said one could imagine another Cabinet committee which would include former
Tory Chancellor Kenneth Clarke on Europe and, ultimately, a national government.
"I think the truth is what this will do is to obliterate debate in Parliament
and obliterate choice in the ballot-box," Mr Benn said. He pointed to "old Labour" Lionel Jospin's victory in France and claimed New Labour had "put its toe in the water for a paddle and was overwhelmed by a tidal wave". He added: "I think what really happened on May 1 is that people wanted real
change."
Fellow Labour MP and constitutional expert Tony Wright, who is close to Mr Blair, accused Mr Benn of helping to keep Labour out of power for a generation.
"We're interested in keeping it in power for a generation and making the
centre-left the dominant power in British politics," he said.
Mr Wright added: "We re-made Clause 4 to say exactly what we believed in. We've argued it's possible to combine a dynamic economy with social
responsibility, the state with the market, the public with private.
It's working very well, we're terribly popular. I just regret the fact that
there are those voices around who prefer the old kind of politics where we used
to lose".
The former Liberal leader and now Liberal Democrat peer Lord Steel said: "There
is no conspiracy here to merge the two parties."
He said the Cabinet committee was about constitutional issues, about broadening the processes of government and the very reverse of the narrowing style of Baroness Thatcher's government, "throwing out of the room people who didn't actually agree with her in her own party".
"What Tony Blair is about is bringing in businessmen, Liberal Democrats,
anybody else who can actually contribute to the processes of government and I
think that is healthy," he said.
Tony Wright and Lord Steel discuss New Labour on the Today programme
Dur: 6'28
I'm No Longer Loyal to Labour, Admits Hattersley
Mr Benn was joined in his criticism of New Labour by the former Labour deputy leader Roy Hattersley. In an article in The Guardian newspaper, he argues that Tony Blair's Government "is not a force for a more equal society".
In an article headed, "Why I'm no longer loyal to Labour", Mr
Hattersley, who stood down at the last election, said: "In truth it is hard to
describe New Labour as a democratic socialist party and, much to his credit,
Tony Blair has always been frank about his wish to create what he calls the
radical centre ground of politics."
He went on: "That creates problems for those of us for whom equality is an article of
faith. We should rejoice at the victory of May 1. The Blair Government is not only incomparably better than its predecessor. In many ways it is admirable in its own right. But it is not a force for a more equal society."
|