Referendums Bill Set For a Swift Passage
The Government has succeeded in its attempt to secure a swift passge through the House of Commons for its Referendums Bill, despite Conservative charges that it is "bulldozing" the legislation through Parliament.
A "guillotine" motion, which will limit the time available for the Bill's debate, was carried by 420 votes to 154, a Government majority of 266.
The decision to introduce the guillotine on the Referendums Bill was announced on Monday night by the Leader of the House, Ann Taylor. It followed Conservative attempts to hijack the Bill by tabling over 250 ammendments - a measure which would almost certainly see the Bill filibustered,.
Despite the Government's crushing majority, ministers faced lively challenges from the Opposition benches and from Labour MP Tam Dalyell, a longstanding critic of devolution.
Labour "Arrogance"
The former Home Secretary, Michael Howard, accused ministers of treating the House in an "arrogant and dismissive way", adding, "After just a month in office, the Government has already demonstrated its contempt for Parliament."
He renewed Conservative condemnation of ministers' plans to hold the referendums before the legislation that will make plain Labour's plans for a Scottish Parliament and a Welsh assembly had been drawn up.
Mr Howard said, "The referendum should take place after the legislation and it should take full account of the legislation and it should be a specific question referring to the legislation."
Winding up the debate on the timetable motion for the Opposition, Tory leadership contender William Hague accused the Government of a "cavalier use of the power to guillotine" and an "arrogant abuse of power".
The Shadow Welsh Secretary insisted, "This guillotine isn't about merely
limiting debate but denying it."
He said Mrs Taylor's behaviour was a disgrace, "She has been bullied into
surrendering the rights of the House by the Secretaries of State for Wales and
Scotland."
This added up to a "growing streak of arrogance" in the Government's
behaviour, Mr Hague said. "What seemed like carelessness has now turned into a habit of overweening arrogance," he protested.
"The use of referendums to gain a general mandate rather than approval for
specific proposals is an anti-parliamentary device."
Tory "Humbug"
Dismissing the Tories' complaints as "humbug", the Scottish Secretary
declared "It's not a case of us pushing something through in a way never dared
before...bulldozing Parliament by a bullying executive.
"The whiff of constitutional outrage drifting around the Chamber yesterday
quickly disperses when you look at the facts.
"We really cannot have the kind of myth perpetrated that this has never been
done before and it's some sort of new jungle territory into which we are
plunging, where democracy will die among the snakes."
Alex Salmond, the leader of the Scottish National Party accused Tories of putting up many "insulting" amendments. Saying, "the Government has been guilty of arrogance...but the charge of arrogance coming from the Conservative frontbench takes some stomaching from the rest of us.
"I am rather glad that these amendments are not going to be treated seriously
by this House."
The McAllister Problem
Despite the Government's victory in the timetable motion, Labour's veteran opponent to devolution, Tam Dalyell, called on the House to give "serious consideration" to "what can be encapsulated as the Gary McAllister Problem or the Paul Lambert Problem".
Gary McAllister, who plays for Coventry City in the English Premiership, will
not be allowed to vote in the referendum on the establishment of a Scottish
parliament because he is not living in Scotland.
Paul Lambert, who plays for European Champions Borussia Dortmund in the German
league, will not be able to vote in the referendum because he is working
elsewhere in the European Union.
Mr Dalyell said: "A whole number of Scots who are working in the European
community, often for the Government or the great firms of this country, they too feel...that they should take part, whichever way they will vote."
Later, during the committee stage debate, he asked how Scottish servicemen
based in Germany could take part in the referendum.
|